Aileen Wuornos: Selling of a Serial Killer

Aileen Wuornos: Selling of a Serial Killer, directed by renowned British filmmaker Nick Broomfield, is a chilling and thought-provoking documentary from 1992. It tells the grim story of convicted serial killer Aileen Wuornos, an infamous figure in American crime history. Far from being a straightforward exploration of Wuornos' crimes, the documentary delves into the circumstances surrounding her trial, the media frenzy it incited, and the uncomfortable reality of her commodification as the "first female serial killer".

The documentary stars Aileen Wuornos herself, in a series of jailhouse interviews lent a haunting quality by her stark honesty and palpable sense of disdain for the camera. Wuornos' complex character shines through in these unsettling interactions, providing viewers with a glimpse into her turbulent life and harrowing experiences. She is a woman accused of cold-blooded murder, who led an existence warped by violence, abuse, and destitution.

Equally enthralling is Nick Broomfield, the man behind the camera's lens, who becomes an integral part of the narrative itself. His interactions and involvement with Wuornos present him as more than just a bystander; he becomes a participant in the unfolding drama. Through his investigatory approach, he exposes the system's questionable methods and motivations. Displaying his unique style, Broomfield unravels the intricate web of money, lies, manipulation, and exploitation spun around Wuornos' notorious case.

An intriguing figure in the film is Arlene Pralle, a horse breeder and born-again Christian who adopted Wuornos when the latter was in prison. She is depicted as an unsettling figure, her eerily cheerful demeanor and blind support for a convicted killer raising pertinent questions. Pralle's relationship with Wuornos is complex and thought-provoking, with the viewer left to ponder whether it’s a case of genuine concern or another instance of Wuornos' exploitation.

The movie’s narrative primarily revolves around the prospect of Wuornos obtaining a fair trial given the media frenzy, and how those involved with her manipulated her notoriety for personal gain. Broomfield suggests that the case was prejudiced by factors external to the actual crimes. He presents a searing critique of the circumstances surrounding Wuornos' trial, including accusations of police misbehavior and controversies around her representation. The film is also imbued with a distinct critique of the death penalty, particularly the socially constructed image of Wuornos as a monster that needed to be put down.

The film’s title "Selling of a Serial Killer" reflects Broomfield’s disdain for the way Wuornos' dark and disturbing saga was exploited for money, media ratings, and, shockingly, even political careers. From Pralle and Wuornos' defense attorney to law enforcement officers, Broomfield exposes the opportunistic nature of those involved in the case. His interviews are a disturbing testament to the manipulation inherent in high-profile murder cases.

The cinematography of the film intentionally lacks polish, reinforcing the raw and gritty nature of the narrative. The unsettling composition of scenes underlines the narrative's dark, uneasy undertone. The film uses panning shots, close-ups, and stark contrasts between light and darkness to create strong visual metaphors.

The documentary gives the viewer an intimate look at the inner workings and failures of the criminal justice system. Through a combination of social critique and emotional tenacity, the film powerfully conveys a tale of exploitation and moral corruption at the heart of American society.

Aileen Wuornos: Selling of a Serial Killer is thus a profound and alarming exploration of crime, punishment, insidious opportunism, and media manipulation. It offers a disturbing portrayal of Aileen Wuornos' life, illuminating the circumstances that shaped her and the system that failed her. This documentary is not just an account of her horrific crimes but a reflection of the society that exploited, judged, and ultimately condemned her. It leaves viewers questioning the very fundamentals of justice, media responsibility, and the human condition.