#Unfit

Unfit: The Psychology of Donald Trump is a compelling 2020 documentary film that sets out to analyse the mental health of the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. Produced by Dan Partland and Art Horan, this explosive investigation navigates the controversial space that blends psychology, politics, and societal implications. The film features substantial contributions from professionals like Malcolm Nance, George Conway, and John Gartner along with a mix of mental health professionals, former officials, authors, and conservative political commentators.

Unfit The film unfolds with Malcolm Nance, a former United States Navy senior chief petty officer in naval cryptology, whose expertise in intelligence analysis, counter-terrorism, and national security is brought to bear in dissecting Trump's psyche. George Conway, an attorney and vocal critic of Trump despite being married to Trump aide Kellyanne Conway, provides his perspective on the President's behavior and his experiences in the political sphere. Meanwhile, psychologist John Gartner, founder of Duty to Warn, an organization of mental health professionals who advocate Trump’s removal under the 25th amendment due to his psychological unfitness, lends his perspective to the discussion.

To provide a balanced view and not make the film seem like an opinion piece, the producers also include inputs from conservatives and Trump supporters. They not only ponder but also challenge the question of whether Trump is mentally unfit and ask if it is necessary or even ethical to psychoanalyze a political figure in the public sphere. The discussion goes beyond a mere political critique, delving into the realm of moral evaluation.

At the heart of Unfit is the understanding of the Goldwater Rule - a guideline coined by the American Psychiatric Association that discourages psychiatrists from giving a professional opinion about public figures they have not examined personally. The film boldly challenges this rule, arguing that the magnitude of Trump's influence and the potential consequences of his decisions for the nation - and the world - justifies the professional risk.

The narrative carefully structures Trump's observed behaviors along with professional opinions into the recognized, diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The film hones in on the claimed manifestations of malignant narcissism, a blend of narcissism, antisocial personality disorder, aggression, and sadism in Trump's behavior.

Utilizing a variety of interview footage, public records, and real-time public incidents, the film stitches together an intriguing, albeit controversial mosaic of facts, opinions, and inferences. It does not shy away from triggering conversations on topics such as leader-induced cultural shifts, division, bullying, post-truth era, white supremacy, and homophobia.

Despite its clear political context and its potential to generate controversy, Unfit seeks to address a wider theme of the psychological fitness of those in power. It tries to grapple with the implications, dangers, and potential fallout of having mentally unfit individuals wielding immense power.

However, it is essential to note that Unfit doesn't claim to provide a clinical diagnosis of Donald Trump. Instead, it allows an informed assessment of the 45th President of the United States through the prism of psychoanalysis. It stands out significantly from other films in the genre due to its incorporation of mental health professionals. Their explanations of psychological behaviors, personality disorders, and related treatment and diagnoses make complex psychological concepts accessible to the public.

While the film attempts to dissect and explore the psyche of one of the most potent political figures in the world, its central premise goes beyond an individual's psyche. It serves as a commentary on the larger society that sanctions, endorses, or turns a blind eye towards such behavior for political reasons. The film, thus, also initiates a conversation about society's moral and psychological health.

On the technical front, Unfit is deftly produced. It utilizes archival footage brilliantly to maintain viewer engagement and effectively punctuates this with investigative interviews. The linear structure ensures an organized layout of all the ideas, making it an accessible watch for viewers who may not have expertise in politics or psychology.

In conclusion, Unfit: The Psychology of Donald Trump is a remarkable cinematic endeavor that dares to break the silence about the mental fitness of politicians in power. It engages viewers intellectually and emotionally, encouraging them to question, reflect, and confront the realities of our political landscape and its potential dangers.